By R. Sasankan
Rabble rousers can easily inflame passions among indigent populations
and effortlessly unleash a lava of popular anger against public policy
and projects. Cunning and resourceful politicians in India -- most of
whom are in the pay of the big business lobbies -- have at various
points in time been able scuttle projects of economic benefits by raking
up irrelevant and emotive issues.
Mass poverty provides the hotbed where such pernicious practices thrive.
Over the years, India has witnessed the amazing spectacle of the rural
poor being deliberately misled to agitate on imaginary issues like
ecology and pollution and scuttle large industrial projects that can
provide mass employment. The naive will continue to be in the thrall of
these unprincipled politicians and the self-styled environmental
activists who have ulterior motives while provoking poor people to work
against their own interests.
We have seen this scenario play out many times in the past. Not very
long ago, we saw how farmers were swept up in a cauldron of protest
against the Tata car project at Singur in the Hooghly district of West
Bengal, forcing one of the largest industrial groups in the country to
shift the plant to Gujarat leading to a tremendous loss of business
opportunity. An imaginative political leadership could have resolved the
issue by providing a remunerative price to the farmers for their land
and ensuring them jobs in the car project. The agitation ruined the
political fortunes of the Marxist Communist party which ruled the state
without interruption for 37 years and paved the way for Mamata
Banerjee’s rise to power. Banerjee's political party, the Trinamul
Congress, extended total support to the agitation of the farmers.
Result: West Bengal floundered and turned into an economically backward
state, forcing its unemployed youth to travel all the way to states like
Kerala in search of jobs.
The provocation for this column is the developments surrounding the 60
MMTPA mega refinery project proposed on the west coast in the state of
Maharashtra. The Covid-19 pandemic has killed so many projects in the
petroleum sector all over the world. Oil majors such as Saudi Aramco,
ExxonMobil and BP are facing serious liquidity problems. Aramco
reportedly walked out of the prestigious refinery project in China.
There were media reports that Aramco would drop out of the mega refinery
project in Maharashtra too. Surprisingly, both Aramco and Adnoc of UAE
remain committed to it. The Government of India cannot afford to let
them down.
The future of the refinery seemed to be blighted when the villagers in
the Ratnagiri area launched an agitation in 2018 against locating the
refinery in the "ecologically sensitive" Ratnagiri district. The
agitation had the support of the Shiv Sena, a partner in the then
BJP-led government in the state. The very same Shiv Sena is now heading
the government with the BJP in the opposition. The very same villagers
who opposed the refinery two years ago are now keen to have the refinery
in the same location at Ratnagiri. (Read column Policy for details).
The 60 MMTPA integrated refinery-cum-petrochemicals complex will be the
largest in the world. No sensible government can afford to lose such a
project which, along with the associated industrial clusters, has the
potential to create 50,000 jobs. In fact, India almost fluffed the
investment opportunity -- a disaster that was barely averted because of
the strong affinity at the highest levels with the political leadership
in the two countries and the allure that the Indian market holds over
foreign investors.
It is now abundantly clear that the agitation against the refinery was
instigated by some powerful business lobbies. Who could that be? The
house of Tatas never indulges in such unethical business practices.
Mukesh Ambani and his Reliance Industries have excellent relations with
Aramco and the Saudi Kingdom. Adani, who is considered close to Prime
Minister Modi, will not do anything to harm the refinery project. Even
if an intelligent guess is possible by an enterprising journalist, he
cannot afford to write about it because of the perils of a defamation
charge that will stick in the absence of documentary evidence.
It is absolutely clear that some very powerful forces are opposed to the
project. The same force is believed to have worked against the Tata car
project at Singur. This has nothing to do with rivalry in the
automobile industry. The strategy is to block the growth of the house of
Tatas. This mimics the cloak-and-dagger ploy that powerful western
intelligence agencies use by covertly funding rival terrorist and
religious groups that can be tapped to attain a strategic objective
whenever the situation demands.
The opponents of the refinery project had hoped if land acquisition for
the mega refinery was delayed, Aramco and Adnoc would pull out of the
project. That has not happened. As reported in our policy column in the
same issue, the promoters of the refinery have made it abundantly clear
that they want the refinery in the coastal location and the alternate
location in Raigad district, which was proposed by the previous Fadnavis
government, is not acceptable. If the coastal location is not possible,
they will exercise the option to leave Maharashtra and go to a state
which offers a suitable location. The Shiv Sena which supported the
agitation against the refinery in Ratnagiri cannot be enthusiastic in
acquiring land for the project in the same area. Nearly 70 per cent of
the originally identified location was barren land which overnight
became ecologically sensitive. For the Maharashtra government, more
particularly for the Shiv Sena, losing the project to a neighbouring
state can be politically damaging. It appears that the villagers are
willing to launch an agitation to bring the refinery project back to
Ratnagiri.
Normally, Indian Oil Corporation, which leads the Indian PSUs in the
mega refinery consortium, is resourceful enough to identify the
mysterious forces that have been working against the refinery. But it
does not seem to have exercised its investigative skills that it is
believed to possess. The Modi government must have already received
reports from its Intelligence Bureau. True, the evidence in such cases
cannot be water tight and fool proof but it is sufficient for an alert
government to act. The issue is serious enough to warrant intervention
at the highest level so that the project wreckers are identified and
exposed.
To download the latest issue 'Volume 31 Issue 1 - April 10, 2024', click here |